Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Does stacking improve fault diagnosis? A case study with reciprocating air compressor vibration signals
School of Mechanical Engineering (SMEC), Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, India.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Operation, Maintenance and Acoustics.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4034-8859
Department of Mechatronics, Nehru Institute of Engineering and Technology, Coimbatore, India.
School of Mechanical Engineering (SMEC), Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, India.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5323-6418
2026 (English)In: Journal of Risk and Reliability, ISSN 1748-006X, E-ISSN 1748-0078, article id 1748006X261422106Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Ensemble learning methods, particularly stacking, are often expected to enhance the performance of machine learning models. In this study, an investigation was carried out on whether stacking consistently improves classification accuracy in the context of fault diagnosis. Vibration signals collected from a reciprocating air compressor wherein three distinct features such as statistical, histogram and autoregressive moving average (ARMA) features were extracted. The most significant features were selected using the J48 algorithm and a variety of machine learning classifiers were trained on these features. The performances of individual classifiers were recorded and compared against stacking ensembles built from the same models. The results show that while several individual models achieved high classification performance, stacking did not provide consistent improvements. These findings highlight that stacking was ineffective on the considered air compressor dataset and is not always advantageous in fault diagnosis.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sage Publications, 2026. article id 1748006X261422106
Keywords [en]
air compressor, fault diagnosis, fault monitoring, machine learning, stacking
National Category
Other Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering Other Mechanical Engineering
Research subject
Operation and Maintenance Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-116658DOI: 10.1177/1748006x261422106ISI: 001704650200001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105031577209OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-116658DiVA, id: diva2:2043774
Available from: 2026-03-06 Created: 2026-03-06 Last updated: 2026-04-10

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Venkatesh, Naveen

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Venkatesh, NaveenVaithiyanathan, Sugumaran
By organisation
Operation, Maintenance and Acoustics
In the same journal
Journal of Risk and Reliability
Other Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information EngineeringOther Mechanical Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 35 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf