1819202122232421 of 98
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Cognitive performance differences between Chinese and European students in the UK: An effect of linguistic difference?
School of Foreign Languages, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; HUST-GYENNO CNS Intelligent Digital Medicine Technology Center, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; School of Philosophy, Psychology & Language Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
School of Philosophy, Psychology & Language Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Health, Education and Technology, Health, Medicine and Rehabilitation.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2511-1631
School of Philosophy, Psychology & Language Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
2026 (English)In: Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, ISSN 1366-7289, E-ISSN 1469-1841Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

This study examines how linguistic differences between Chinese and European languages influence cognitive functions. Two experiments compared cognitive performance between Chinese and European undergraduates. Experiment 1 compared Chinese and European bilinguals (e.g., Chinese-English versus French-English) studying at an English university. Chinese bilinguals exhibited stronger executive control, inhibitory control and mental rotation, suggesting that greater linguistic distance enhances cognitive control. Experiment 2 examined native Chinese and English speakers in their respective countries, isolating language-script effects. Chinese speakers performed better in visual attention (i.e., orienting and facilitation) and mental rotation, while English speakers exhibited superior performance in auditory attention (i.e., attentional switching). These differences likely stem from language-script characteristics: logographic Chinese engages visuospatial processing, while alphabetic English reinforces auditory attention flexibility. Collectively, these findings underscore specific cognitive effects associated with linguistic distance and language script and provide comprehensive insights into how language structure modulates domain-specific cognitive adaptations.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Cambridge University Press , 2026.
Keywords [en]
bilingualism, executive functions, linguistic distance, language script, writing system, young adult
National Category
Comparative Language Studies and Linguistics Studies of Specific Languages
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-117751DOI: 10.1017/S136672892610114XScopus ID: 2-s2.0-105039223111OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-117751DiVA, id: diva2:2064515
Note

Full text: CC BY license;

Available from: 2026-06-02 Created: 2026-06-02 Last updated: 2026-06-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(844 kB)23 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 844 kBChecksum SHA-512
b7b28aa2311c050eb8c7f039349db08aed41a03d36d30e771900c09292668e231b228381ba26a814d288fe95bd957e0707c830833e22f309c4bf248aedbdf1df
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Vega-Mendoza, Mariana

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Vega-Mendoza, Mariana
By organisation
Health, Medicine and Rehabilitation
In the same journal
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition
Comparative Language Studies and LinguisticsStudies of Specific Languages

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 718 hits
1819202122232421 of 98
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf