System disruptions
There are recurring service disruptions on some of the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A tool for evaluating the quality of laminated particleboard countertop
Mississippi State University, Department of Sustainable Bioproducts, Mississippi.
Mississippi State University, Department of Sustainable Bioproducts, Mississippi.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Wood Science and Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5872-2792
Mississippi State University, Department of Sustainable Bioproducts, Mississippi.
Number of Authors: 42016 (English)In: Wood and Fiber Science, ISSN 0735-6161, Vol. 48, no 4, p. 297-301Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

To evaluate the quality of laminated particleboard, a typical type of laminate was used in laminating particleboard with operational parameters similar to industry operation. Pull-off tests using Elcometer 510 were conducted. In addition, panel vertical density profiles (VDP) and the pH of particleboard at different layers were tested. The results showed that the laminated panel bonded by polyvinyl acetate (PVA) glue had higher pull-off strength than that of the phenol formaldehyde (PF) glue within corresponding sanding thickness. Sanding off 0.0762 mm resulted in higher pull-off strength than sanding off 0.0254 mm. The laminates had the highest pull-off strength when the PB were sanded off 0.0762 mm and glued by PVA. This has provided a solution to improve lamination pull-of strength for industry. The test results have also shown that the laminated panels produced in the manufactures have the potential to be improved. It also indicates that Elcometer 510 is a good tool to evaluate the particleboard lamination quality.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
International Society of Wood Science and Technology , 2016. Vol. 48, no 4, p. 297-301
National Category
Other Mechanical Engineering
Research subject
Wood Science and Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-13494ISI: 000388430500008Local ID: cb6e13fa-9d9a-41e3-9356-c0fa2923ade4OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-13494DiVA, id: diva2:986447
Note

Validerad; 2017; Nivå 2; 2016-12-19 (andbra)

Available from: 2016-09-29 Created: 2016-09-29 Last updated: 2025-10-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

http://www.swst.org/publications/wfs/preprints/48%283%29/WFS2281.pdf

Authority records

Wang, Xiaodong (Alice)

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wang, Xiaodong (Alice)
By organisation
Wood Science and Engineering
In the same journal
Wood and Fiber Science
Other Mechanical Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 216 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf