Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Tunnel QRA: Present and Future Perspectives
Luleå University of Technology. Cyient Limited, Hyderabad, India.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0151-8747
Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Haugesund, Norway.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Operation, Maintenance and Acoustics.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8111-6918
Luleå University of Technology.
2019 (English)In: System Performance and Management Analytics / [ed] P. K. Kapur, Yury Klochkov, Ajit Kumar Verma, Gurinder Singh, Springer, 2019, p. 387-403Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

With the vision of faster in-land transportation of humans and goods, long tunnels with increasing engineering complexities are being designed, constructed and operated. Such complexities arise due to terrain (network of small tunnels) and requirement of multiple entries and exits (network of traffics leading to non-homogenous behaviour). Increased complexities of such tunnels throw unique challenges for performing QRA for such tunnels, which gets compounded due to handful number of experiments performed in real tunnels, as they are costly and dangerous. A combined approach of CFD modelling of scaled down tunnels could be a relatively less resource intensive solution, nevertheless, associated with its increased uncertainties due to introduction of scaling multiplication factors. Further, with the advent of smart system designs and cheap computational cost, a smart tunnel which manages its own traffic of both dangerous goods carriers and other passenger vehicles based on continuously updated dynamic risk estimate, is not far from reality.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2019. p. 387-403
Series
Asset Analytics, ISSN 2522-5162
Keywords [en]
Quantitative risk assessment (QRA), Tunnels, Fire dynamics, Risk analysis, F-N, EV, QRAM, Froude scaling, Smart tunnel, Dynamic risk of tunnel
National Category
Other Civil Engineering
Research subject
Operation and Maintenance Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-70277DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-7323-6_31ISBN: 978-981-10-7322-9 (print)ISBN: 978-981-10-7323-6 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-70277DiVA, id: diva2:1237413
Available from: 2018-08-08 Created: 2018-08-08 Last updated: 2025-11-20Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Enhancing Tunnel Fire Safety in Design and Operation: Computational Modeling and Risk Mitigation Strategies for Passenger and Goods Carrier
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Enhancing Tunnel Fire Safety in Design and Operation: Computational Modeling and Risk Mitigation Strategies for Passenger and Goods Carrier
2025 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Road tunnels need a robust risk management strategy being critical component of modern transportation network. Change in vehicle types with intrinsic hazard source change due to evolution of power sources (H2, EV etc.), tunnels must evolve into intelligent infrastructures to safeguard lives through robust engineering and proactive risk governance mechanism.

The risk profile within a road tunnel fluctuates instantaneously based on the types and volumes of vehicles present. Traditional design-stage risk assessments, often grounded in conservative assumptions, fall short in managing such dynamic infrastructure. Advancements in high-performance computing and computer vision technology, a real-time tunnel risk estimation can be achieved. This necessitates a robust methodology for continuous risk quantification, enabling proactive monitoring and timely intervention to manage risk.

The primary objective of this research work was to develop dynamic risk estimation framework for road tunnels, forming the basis for a smart tunnel Risk Monitor that evaluates real-time risk based on vehicle types, traffic volume, and hazard potential. Applied to the Bhatan tunnel under simplified traffic assumptions and simulated traffic flow conditions, to derive a correlation between overtaking and severe accident collision probability. The methodology models event progression using an event tree and estimates risk every second over a one-year period. The framework demonstrates scalability across diverse tunnel configurations, vehicle categories, and traffic volumes.

As secondary objective, it provided the method to derive the URCL, the Upper Risk Control Limit and ARTL, the Acceptable Risk Threshold Limit for effective risk management of a tunnel and demonstrated the evaluation using the estimated one-year risk profile for Bhatan tunnel. Further, it recommended administrative actions and restrictions that can be initiated triggered once instantaneous risk reaches the URCL and stopped with the restoration of ARTL. 

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were used to estimate peak heat release rates (HRR), aligning closely with results from the Runehamar tunnel fire experiment involving heavy goods vehicles (~200 MW). Simulations were extended to five vehicle categories viz. cars, SUVs, six and ten-wheeler trucks and buses with certain substitute material fire properties like n-heptane as engine oil and mixture of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) & urethane as burnable materials in all vehicles. The observed peak HRR values exceeded significantly for cars, SUV/LMVs (~25 MW vs ~ 5 MW) and bus (~ 200 MW vs ~ 20 MW) those suggested by some of the widely adopted international guidelines. This study therefore proposes revised HRR benchmarks for individual passenger and freight vehicles, intended for use in tunnel design-stage safety and risk assessments.

This study introduced and applied a potential two-vehicle collision scenario weighted methodology to estimate the design fire load or peak heat release rate (HRR) for road tunnels. The approach was implemented for five reference vehicle categories in Bhatan to estimate the design basis peak HRR at 81 MW, offering a refined framework for evaluating fire severity under realistic multi-vehicle conditions.

This study established the groundwork for the development of a Tunnel Risk Monitoring and Management System (TRMMS) for a smart tunnel. Integrating the proposed risk estimation framework with computer vision and deep learning for vehicle classification, hazard assessment, and speed detection can enable intelligent, real-time risk monitoring.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Lulea: Luleå University of Technology, 2025
Series
Doctoral thesis / Luleå University of Technology 1 jan 1997 → …, ISSN 1402-1544
Keywords
Tunnel risk analysis, Dynamic risk assessment, Collision probability, Severe accident, Fire scenario, Two-vehicle fire, Peak HRR, Upper control limit, Acceptable risk threshold, Risk monitoring
National Category
Infrastructure Engineering
Research subject
Operation and Maintenance Engineering
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-115340 (URN)978-91-8048-943-0 (ISBN)978-91-8048-944-7 (ISBN)
Public defence
2025-12-16, F531, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, 09:30 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2025-11-11 Created: 2025-11-11 Last updated: 2025-11-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Jena, Jajati KeshariKumar, Uday

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jena, Jajati KeshariKumar, Uday
By organisation
Luleå University of TechnologyOperation, Maintenance and Acoustics
Other Civil Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 3804 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf