Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A comparison among fuzzy multi-criteria decision making, bivariate, multivariate and machine learning models in landslide susceptibility mapping
Institute of Applied Technology, Thu Dau Mot University, Binh Duong province, Vietnam.
Department of Civil Engineering, Bordj Bou Arreridj University, El Annasser, Algeria.
Faculty of Science, Department of Geography, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India.
Faculty of Science, Department of Geography, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India.
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, ISSN 1947-5705, E-ISSN 1947-5713, Vol. 12, no 1, p. 1741-1777Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Landslides are dangerous events which threaten both human life and property. The study aims to analyze the landslide susceptibility (LS) in the Kysuca river basin, Slovakia. For this reason, previous landslide events were analyzed with 16 landslide conditioning factors. Landslide inventory was divided into training (70% of landslide locations) and validating dataset (30% of landslide locations). The heuristic approach of Fuzzy Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (FDEMATEL)-Analytic Network Process (ANP) was applied first, followed by bivariate Frequency Ratio (FR), multivariate Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest Classifier (RFC), Naive Bayes Classifier (NBC) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), respectively. The results showed that 52.2%, 36.5%, 40.7%, 50.6%, 43.6% and 40.3% of the total basin area had very high to high LS corresponding to FDEMATEL-ANP, FR, LR, RFC, NBC and XGBoost model, respectively. The analysis revealed that RFC was the most accurate model (overall accuracy of 98.3% and AUC of 97.0%). Besides, the heuristic approach of FDEMATEL-ANP model (overall accuracy of 93.8% and AUC of 92.4%) had better prediction capability than bivariate FR (overall accuracy of 86.9% and AUC of 86.1%), multivariate LR (overall accuracy of 90.5% and AUC of 91.2%), machine learning NBC (overall accuracy of 76.3% and AUC of 90.9%) and even deep learning XGBoost (overall accuracy of 92.3% and AUC of 87.1%) models. The study revealed that the FDEMATEL-ANP outweighed the NBC and XGBoost machine learning models, which suggests that heuristic methods should be tested out before directly applying machine learning models.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2021. Vol. 12, no 1, p. 1741-1777
Keywords [en]
Fuzzy DEMATEL-ANP, bivariate frequency ratio, multivariate logistic regression, machine learning, landslide susceptibility mapping
National Category
Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Research subject
Soil Mechanics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-86407DOI: 10.1080/19475705.2021.1944330ISI: 000670489100001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85109356788OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-86407DiVA, id: diva2:1580788
Note

Validerad;2021;Nivå 2;2021-07-16 (johcin);

Funder: Slovak Research and Development Agency (no. AP VV-18-0185); KEGA agency (no. 015UKF-4/2019); Deanship of Scientific Research, King Khalid University (no. RGP 2/173/42)

Available from: 2021-07-16 Created: 2021-07-16 Last updated: 2025-10-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(6921 kB)298 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 6921 kBChecksum SHA-512
e437cc2eb53e7951ca0991ea52b01ec251dbb601d661c37d3ada6b0c9590d9fa832c347b2f09caa9e1a211eb4335d328e2af8d288c11751b160c3b796a6a9ac8
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Al-Ansari, Nadhir

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Al-Ansari, Nadhir
By organisation
Mining and Geotechnical Engineering
In the same journal
Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk
Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 298 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 155 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf