Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Exploring product modularity in residential building areas
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Industrilized and sustainable construction.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6416-1717
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Industrilized and sustainable construction.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2699-2533
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Industrilized and sustainable construction.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1744-4981
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, 94305, CA, United States.
2021 (English)In: Buildings, E-ISSN 2075-5309, Vol. 11, no 7, article id 281Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This study explores how the logic of product modularity could be useful for the design of complete residential building areas. Previous research has noted that product modularity is usually only applicable if a ‘full modularization’ approach is pursued (i.e., an approach with completely defined modules). This is challenging in Engineer To Order production strategies. Therefore, an approach towards partial product modularity is sought instead. In this approach, the modules are lesser defined to allow flexibility following, e.g., architectural design freedom, as well as per project-specific requirements posed in house-building projects. This study identifies nine (9) ‘modules’ which are denominated as functional spaces. By explaining how unique project requirements affect functional spaces, some integral elements of house-building are detailed. By evaluating the functional spaces in regards to the level of predefinition, as well as the level of relationship, their level of modularity is explored. The usefulness of partial modularity for house-building is suggested to be for coordination of design work and support tools that aides design work. This study suggests that partial modularity can be a feasible approach towards modularity without the need for countermeasures in terms of increasing product predefinition.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MDPI, 2021. Vol. 11, no 7, article id 281
Keywords [en]
Early phase house-building, Engineer-to-order, Modularity, Residential building areas
National Category
Building Technologies
Research subject
Construction Management and Building Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-86506DOI: 10.3390/buildings11070281ISI: 000676427800001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85109835488OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-86506DiVA, id: diva2:1582508
Funder
National Board of Housing, Building and Planning, 6467/2018
Note

Validerad;2021;Nivå 2;2021-08-04 (beamah)

Available from: 2021-08-02 Created: 2021-08-02 Last updated: 2025-10-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Eriksson, HenrikSandberg, MarcusJansson, Gustav

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Eriksson, HenrikSandberg, MarcusJansson, Gustav
By organisation
Industrilized and sustainable construction
In the same journal
Buildings
Building Technologies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 729 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf