Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Horizontal bracing between bottom flanges in composite I-girder bridges – A state of the art review
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Structural and Fire Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9627-4713
New York State Department of Transportation, 50 Wolf Rd., Albany, NY 12232, United States.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Structural and Fire Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8353-9225
Finnish Transportation Infrastructure Agency, Opastinsilta 12 A, Helsinki 00520, Finland.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, ISSN 1084-0680, E-ISSN 1943-5576, Vol. 30, no 3, article id 04025061Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Something as simple as the use of lateral bracing for a steel I-girder bridge should be consistent across the globe. However, an investigation into the bridge standards of different countries in Europe and North America revealed little to no consistency in how and why lateral bracing is specified or detailed. Most design codes recognize that adding lateral bracing—the diagonal bracing between the bottom flanges of a typical I-girder bridge superstructure—changes the load path of an I-girder bridge sufficiently to mimic the increased stiffness and fatigue life performance of a much more expensive steel box beam superstructure. Still, lateral bracing is rarely used or, if used, not accounted for in the structural capacity of the structure. This is often because the maximum benefit is found with superstructures with few deep girders in the cross section, and far less benefit is seen for shallower multigirder cross sections. Additionally, accounting for the structural benefit of the lateral bracing increases the complexity of the bridge analysis model and precludes the use of simplified line-girder methods. For these reasons, the investigation showed that even when lateral bracing is used for reasons such as construction stability, it is rarely accounted for as a primary load carrying member in new structures. Since the inclusion of lateral bracing provides no structural benefit but also adds dead load and structural analysis complexity, most agencies attempt to eliminate lateral bracing from their structures and simply increase the capacity of the I-girders. However, for existing two-girder composite bridges, an approach is presented in which the careful addition of a new or structural consideration of existing bottom lateral bracing on an existing two I-girder superstructure could improve the live load distribution and reduce fatigue live load stress ranges sufficiently enough for the structure to remain in service without further structural strengthening.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2025. Vol. 30, no 3, article id 04025061
Keywords [en]
bridge, composite bridge, horizontal trusses, horizontal bracing, lateral bracing, strengthening, torsional stiffness
National Category
Infrastructure Engineering
Research subject
Structural Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-96209DOI: 10.1061/JSDCCC.SCENG-1644ISI: 001509511800017Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105017575061OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-96209DiVA, id: diva2:1745125
Funder
Svenska Byggbranschens Utvecklingsfond (SBUF), 13227
Note

Validerad;2025;Nivå 1;2025-06-16 (u4);

Funder: BBT; Finnish Transport Infrastructure Agency (Väylävirasto) (8440); Ramboll Foundation (2014-1);

This paper is part of the Journal of Structural Designand Construction Practice;

This article has previously appeared as a manuscript in a thesis.

Available from: 2023-03-22 Created: 2023-03-22 Last updated: 2025-10-21Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. I-girder Composite Bridges with Lateral Bracing: Improved load distribution
Open this publication in new window or tab >>I-girder Composite Bridges with Lateral Bracing: Improved load distribution
2023 (English)Licentiate thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This thesis deals with the subject of lateral bracing between the bottom flanges of I-girder composite bridges. The focus is on the impact of adding lateral bracing on existing bridges, as well as on new bridges. Experience and knowledge from bridge projects around the world are investigated and implemented in the evaluation of the research subject.

Many existing bridges are in need of being strengthened or replaced, due to the increased traffic volume and heavier traffic loads. Different approaches can be used to prolong the lifetime of existing bridges. The approach is different depending on the cause, but for increasing the lifetime regarding fatigue some of the most suitable options are described in this thesis. A proposed concept is presented, in this thesis, along with some research questions to be answered.

The use of lateral bracings in composite bridges varies between different parts of the world. In one country it can be a requirement/common praxis for long span composite bridges with two I-girders, in other countries there are no requirements of using them. Some parts of these regulations and requirements can be traced back to the tradition in both manufacturing and construction of this type of bridges. This thesis investigates how lateral bracing is used around the world to distribute eccentric loads between primary longitudinal structural members, provide resistance to lateral loads, and to permit an existing two-girder structural system to be retrofitted to behave similarly to an often more expensive closed steel box girder.

Furthermore, several case studies have been conducted to investigate the impact on the structural behavior of composite bridges where a lateral bracing is implemented in the structure. The results from these case studies are presented in the thesis and show the advantages of the quasi-box section for which the lateral bracing is closing the composite cross section. By making the I-girder composite cross section acting more like a box-section, the distribution of eccentric loads between the girders is improved. The impact on longitudinal stresses from traffic loads and the additional effects on internal sectional parts are also evaluated and discussed.

Furthermore, proposals of the connection design for lateral bracings in existing bridges are suggested. Finally, conclusions from the results are stated.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Luleå: Luleå University of Technology, 2023
Series
Licentiate thesis / Luleå University of Technology, ISSN 1402-1757
Keywords
assessment, bridge, composite bridge, steel-concrete composite, I-girder, case study, horizontal trusses, lateral bracing, rehabilitation, strengthening, torsional stiffness, upgrading
National Category
Infrastructure Engineering
Research subject
Structural Engineering
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-96212 (URN)978-91-8048-286-8 (ISBN)978-91-8048-287-5 (ISBN)
Presentation
2023-05-12, F1031, Luleå tekniska universitet, Luleå, 10:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2023-03-22 Created: 2023-03-22 Last updated: 2025-10-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Vestman, VictorCollin, PeterHällmark, Robert

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Vestman, VictorCollin, PeterHällmark, Robert
By organisation
Structural and Fire Engineering
In the same journal
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Infrastructure Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 138 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf