System disruptions
There are recurring service disruptions on some of the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Evaluate effect of 126 pre-processing methods on various artificial intelligence models accuracy versus normal mode to predict groundwater level (case study: Hamedan-Bahar Plain, Iran)
Department of Irrigation and Reclamation Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9811-5230
Department of Water Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9252-2241
Faculty of Nature and Life Sciences, Laboratory of Water and Environment, Hassiba Benbouali University of Chlef, Chlef, 02180, Algeria.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6084-5759
Department of Civil Engineering, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Erzincan, Turkey.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6421-6087
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Heliyon, E-ISSN 2405-8440, Vol. 10, no 7, article id e29006Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The estimation of groundwater levels is crucial and an important step in ensuring sustainable management of water resources. In this paper, selected piezometers of the Hamedan-Bahar plain located in west of Iran. The main objective of this study is to compare effect of various pre-processing methods on input data for different artificial intelligence (AI) models to predict groundwater levels (GWLs). The observed GWL, evaporation, precipitation, and temperature were used as input variables in the AI algorithms. Firstly, 126 method of data pre-processing was done by python programming which are classified into three classes: 1- statistical methods, 2- wavelet transform methods and 3- decomposition methods; later, various pre-processed data used by four types of widely used AI models with different kernels, which includes: Support Vector Machine (SVR), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Long-Short Term memory (LSTM), and Pelican Optimization Algorithm (POA) - Artificial Neural Network (POA-ANN) are classified into three classes: 1- machine learning (SVR and ANN), 2- deep learning (LSTM) and 3- hybrid-ML (POA-ANN) models, to predict groundwater levels (GWLs). Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) were used to evaluate and validate the predictive accuracy of algorithms. According to the results, based on summation (train and test phases) of AIC value of 1778 models, average of AIC values for ML, DL, hybrid-ML classes, was decreased to −25.3%, −29.6% and −57.8%, respectively. Therefore, the results showed that all data pre-processing methods do not lead to improvement of prediction accuracy, and they should be selected very carefully by trial and error. In conclusion, wavelet-ANN model with daubechies 13 and 25 neurons (db13_ANN_25) is the best model to predict GWL that has −204.9 value for AIC which has grown by 5.23% (−194.7) compared to the state without any pre-processing method (ANN_Relu_25).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier Ltd , 2024. Vol. 10, no 7, article id e29006
Keywords [en]
Artificial intelligence, Deep learning, Groundwater level, Hybrid algorithm, Machine learning
National Category
Computer Sciences
Research subject
Soil Mechanics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-105116DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29006ISI: 001226648700005PubMedID: 38601575Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85189466450OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-105116DiVA, id: diva2:1851885
Note

Validerad;2024;Nivå 2;2024-04-16 (hanlid);

Funder: Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea (20230166-001);

Full text license: CC BY 4.0

Available from: 2024-04-16 Created: 2024-04-16 Last updated: 2025-10-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(13407 kB)151 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 13407 kBChecksum SHA-512
5ba01142249d650e6087536b40ae4d13fee32f9397354b37650e7f6908c9b4f9de64c8ac4acd81617edee41aa6db976293b43dd2fefe2d584b65d2e4b319f421
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Al-Ansari, Nadhir

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Saroughi, MohsenMirzania, EhsanAchite, MohammedKatipoğlu, Okan MertAl-Ansari, NadhirVishwakarma, Dinesh KumarChung, Il-MoonAlreshidi, Maha AwjanYadav, Krishna Kumar
By organisation
Mining and Geotechnical Engineering
In the same journal
Heliyon
Computer Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 151 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 449 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf