System disruptions
There are recurring service disruptions on some of the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Sustainability reporting in construction and real estate sector: A conceptualization and a review of existing literature
School of Business, Innovation and Sustainability, Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden; Department of Business Studies, School of Social Sciences, Södertörn University, Huddinge, Sweden.
School of Business, Economics and Law, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Social Sciences, Technology and Arts, Business Administration and Industrial Engineering. School of Business, Innovation and Sustainability, Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3377-6177
2024 (English)In: Journal of Cleaner Production, ISSN 0959-6526, E-ISSN 1879-1786, Vol. 477, article id 143886Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Research on Sustainability Reporting (SR) has become a key focus among diverse stakeholder groups, receiving substantial academic attention in top journals covering Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability disciplines (Rahi et al., 2021, Zhang et al., 2019). Contemporary discourses on sustainability elucidate the rationale behind the disclosure of Environmental, Social, and Economic (ESE) information by diverse business entities (Jones et al., 2015, Rahi et al., 2023). Over the past three decades, there has been a notable surge in societal expectations for the disclosure of non-financial information (Pigatto et al., 2023), driven by the need to surpass the limitations of conventional financial reporting (Hopwood, 2009). As stakeholder expectations increase, companies face pressure to extend their reporting scope beyond a focus solely on shareholders (Cho et al., 2015). Besides that, during the recent decade, evolving institutional pressure through e.g., laws and regulations influenced the disclosures of sustainability information (Laine et al., 2020) where companies strive to comply, ensuring their legitimacy and survival (DiMaggio and Powell (1983). According to institutional theory, institutions play a crucial role in shaping the organizational environment (Aragòn-Correa et al., 2020). One of the fundamental arguments underpinning the concept of sustainable business is that it fosters the creation of long-term value for stakeholders while serving as a mechanism for identifying and addressing opportunities and risks, while balancing ESE bottom-line (Mikes et al., 2017).Industry-specific sustainability disclosures have gained emphasis from both global and European regulators, such as the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) and Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) providing sector-specific guidance to understand similarities and differences among companies (Messner, 2016). As the literature on SR rapidly expands, sector-specific studies are needed to better understand interdisciplinary perspective on sustainability and reporting practices (Rahi et al., 2021). With the growing demand for planned cities and modern living spaces, the Construction and Real Estate (CRE) sector play a crucial role in the globalized world and considered as a critical area for sustainability and evaluating SR (Ghisellini et al., 2018). The sector is characterized by long real estate lifecycles (Li et al., 2019) (decades/centuries), a project-based construction nature, high capital intensity, complex supply chains, diverse stakeholder interest, and dynamic economic conditions like interest rates and regulations. It encompasses interconnected components within the broader built environment, including interest rates, investments, regulatory changes and supply, and demand forces.Fluctuations in interest rates impact borrowing costs for construction projects and real estate mortgages, while changes in regulations, incentives, or subsidies impact development costs and investment decisions. Real estate drives construction demand through development, renovation, and expansion, while construction creates physical assets that are bought, sold, and managed within the real estate sector. This interplay means changes in one significantly affect the other. In this article the CRE sector encompasses companies involved in investing, developing, constructing, and managing buildings and infrastructures (GRI, 2016). Investing in sustainable buildings and infrastructures is essential for achieving the European Green Deal agenda and SDGs (MSCI, 2023).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier Ltd , 2024. Vol. 477, article id 143886
Keywords [en]
Sustainability reporting, Construction, and real estate sector, Institutions, Environmental, Social, and Economic
National Category
Business Administration
Research subject
Entrepreneurship and Innovation
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-110496DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143886ISI: 001337381800001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85205976021OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-110496DiVA, id: diva2:1907371
Note

Validerad;2024;Nivå 2;2024-11-26 (sarsun);

Full text license: CC BY;

Funder: Lundbergsstiftelsen;

For correction, see: Shahid H., Sabelfeld L., Johansson J. (2024). Corrigendum to “Sustainability reporting in construction and real estate sector: A conceptualization and a review of existing literature” [J. Clean. Prod. 477 (2024) 143886]. J. Clean. Prod. 477 144018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144018

Available from: 2024-10-22 Created: 2024-10-22 Last updated: 2025-10-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(3136 kB)140 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 3136 kBChecksum SHA-512
1e9ec42ece814fb8b22b7077d9e783b8259ba63e7400345a873eeafdd9fcfdc846e59eeacef6ba2f45a8c2652e3cad58791dd8c842fc479c1841e348fbe7a2db
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf
Corrigendum(282 kB)77 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 282 kBChecksum SHA-512
097cb5dc90b0468264dd06c362af04dbaf63880511a2d0ca3614206cd95d968516dd5b613190642f5863ff8f7d211ccea9af80bedff4bdccd16086734fa10544
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Johansson, Jeaneth

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Johansson, Jeaneth
By organisation
Business Administration and Industrial Engineering
In the same journal
Journal of Cleaner Production
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 220 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 395 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf