Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Advancements in Animal Tracking: Assessing Deep Learning Algorithms
Port City International University, Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering, Chittagong, Bangladesh.
Port City International University, Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering, Chittagong, Bangladesh.
Rangamati Science and Technology University, Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering, Rangamati-4500, Bangladesh.
International Islamic University Chittagong, Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering, Chittagong, Bangladesh.
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: 2024 15th International Conference on Computing Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), IEEE, 2024Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

In the rapidly advancing field of computer vision, object detection has become crucial for various applications, including animal tracking, face detection, and surveillance systems. This study investigates the efficacy of contemporary object detection methodologies by evaluating the performance of the You Only Look Once (YOLO) models and TensorFlow Model Zoo architectures for animal tracking. YOLO models, known for their ability to process entire images in real-time and predict bounding boxes and class probabilities simultaneously, offer significant advantages over traditional methods such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Fast R-CNNs. This paper compares the performance of YOLOv5 and YOLOv7, alongside TensorFlow-based models like Faster R-CNN ResNetv152 and SSD ResNet101, using a dataset of animal images. Our findings reveal that YOLOv5 outperforms other models with a mean average precision (mAP) of 9 7.5%, demonstrating superior accuracy and efficiency in object detection tasks. YOLOv7 also shows strong performance with an mAP of 96.7%, while TensorFlow Model Zoo’s Faster R-CNN and SSD models lag behind with mAPs of 81.9% and 81.6%, respectively. The results highlight the significant advancements in deep learning and object detection algorithms, particularly the advantages of YOLO’s architecture in handling complex detection tasks in real-world scenarios.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
IEEE, 2024.
Keywords [en]
Animal Tracking, YOLO, TensorFlow Model Zoo, Object Detection, Lamb Behavior Analysis
National Category
Computer graphics and computer vision
Research subject
Cyber Security
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-111206DOI: 10.1109/ICCCNT61001.2024.10724124Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85213061917OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-111206DiVA, id: diva2:1924611
Conference
The 15th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), Himachal Pradesh, India, June 24-28, 2024
Note

ISBN for host publication: 979-8-3503-7024-9;

Available from: 2025-01-07 Created: 2025-01-07 Last updated: 2025-10-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Andersson, Karl

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Andersson, Karl
By organisation
Computer Science
Computer graphics and computer vision

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 92 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf