Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Intersectional Gender Equality Challenges–A Review of Gender Equality Research Conducted in Fennoscandian Arctic Academia
Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Department of Sociology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Unit of Gender Studies, Faculty of Education, University of Lapland, Rovaniemi, Finland.
Faculty of Education, University of Lapland, Rovaniemi, Finland.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: NORA: Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, ISSN 0803-8740, E-ISSN 1502-394X, Vol. 33, no 2, p. 205-228Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Context-specific GE knowledge is essential for epistemic contribution, nuanced understanding, and practical GE work in the Arctic HEIs. However, there is a shortage of research regarding gender equality (GE) in these institutions. We explored GE in HEI, and conducted a review on the Scopus database focusing on GE research done in the Nordic countries of Norway, Sweden and Finland. The aim is to explore the produced GE research in an HEI context conducted by scholars affiliated with the Arctic Five universities. As a result, 24 articles met the inclusion criteria, most of which were published in Swedish universities (60%). Articles were dealing with; Academic careers, leadership and gender equality; Change agents and methods for reducing bias; Gendered constructions and gender equality; Discrimination and gender equality, and Entrepreneurship, innovation and gender equality, following mainstream gender equality research. Gender was often presented with binary division, women and men, and as opposite or distinctive from each other. However, some discussions went beyond binary gender categorizations—yet intersectional approaches were not prevalent. Arctic or northern contextualizations were not explicitly presented or elaborated in the studies, neither were Sámi research participants and Sámi researchers’ contribution.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2025. Vol. 33, no 2, p. 205-228
Keywords [en]
Arctic Five, gender inequality, gender equality, higher education institutions, Nordic countries
National Category
Gender Studies
Research subject
Human Work Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-111422DOI: 10.1080/08038740.2024.2446760ISI: 001401493600001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85215601010OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-111422DiVA, id: diva2:1931598
Funder
NordForsk, 123966
Note

Validerad;2025;Nivå 1;2025-06-27 (u5);

Funder: University of Oulu & The Academy of Finland PROFI 4 (318930)

Available from: 2025-01-27 Created: 2025-01-27 Last updated: 2025-10-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Abrahamsson, Lena

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Abrahamsson, Lena
By organisation
Humans and Technology
In the same journal
NORA: Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research
Gender Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 87 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf