Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Multi-objective method integrated with back propagation neural network analysis for surface quality in wood–plastic composite milling
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, Jiangsu, China.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Wood Science and Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7091-6696
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, Jiangsu, China.
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, Jiangsu, China.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, ISSN 0018-3768, E-ISSN 1436-736X, Vol. 83, article id 68Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In wood–plastic composites (WPCs) milling, achieving optimal material removal rates and surface roughness levels are critical objectives. In this study, WPCs milling experiments were conducted, and a back propagation (BP) neural network was applied to develop a predictive model for surface roughness. A geometric method was used to derive the calculation formula for the material removal rate. Subsequently, a multi-objective approach was adopted to determine the optimal combination of control factors, including spindle speed n, feed rate U, milling depth h, for WPCs milling. The findings indicate that an increase in spindle speed reduced surface roughness, whereas higher feed speed and milling depth resulted in increased surface roughness. Variance analysis revealed that milling depth had the greatest impact on surface roughness, contributing 34.66%, followed by feed speed at 30.77% contribution and spindle speed at 30.55% contribution. A BP prediction model for surface roughness was established with high accuracy, exhibiting a maximum error of 4.89%. Furthermore, a multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm was applied to optimize the objectives of minimizing surface roughness and maximizing material removal rate. Based on the obtained Pareto front, the milling parameter combination of n = 12,000 r/min, U = 3.23 m/min, and h = 0.4 mm is recommended for roughing. For semi-finishing, the optimal parameters are n = 12,000 r/min, U = 4.76 m/min, and h = 0.4 mm. For finishing, the suitable combination is n = 12,000 r/min, U = 6 m/min, and h = 0.72 mm. Experimental verification demonstrated a maximum predictive error of 16.87%, confirming the feasibility of the multi-objective optimization approach.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Nature, 2025. Vol. 83, article id 68
National Category
Manufacturing, Surface and Joining Technology
Research subject
Wood Science and Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-111741DOI: 10.1007/s00107-025-02225-zISI: 001427889500002Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85218418429OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-111741DiVA, id: diva2:1940017
Note

Validerad;2025;Nivå 2;2025-02-25 (u5);

Funder: National Natural Science Foundation of China (32471791); Rönnbäret Foundation;

Available from: 2025-02-25 Created: 2025-02-25 Last updated: 2025-10-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Buck, Dietrich

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Buck, Dietrich
By organisation
Wood Science and Engineering
In the same journal
European Journal of Wood and Wood Products
Manufacturing, Surface and Joining Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 52 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf