Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Fault diagnosis in reciprocating air compressors using ensemble voting classifier
School of Mechanical Engineering (SMEC), Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, India.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Operation, Maintenance and Acoustics.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4034-8859
Deparment of Mechanical Engineering, Sri Ranganathar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Coimbatore, India.
School of Mechanical Engineering (SMEC), Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, India.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5323-6418
2025 (English)In: Structural Health Monitoring, ISSN 1475-9217, E-ISSN 1741-3168Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Reciprocating air compressors play a pivotal role in various industrial applications, demanding a steadfast focus on their dependable operation. This research addresses the challenge of fault diagnosis in reciprocating air compressors by leveraging the potential of ensemble voting classifiers. Vibration signals were captured under five compressor conditions, covering both normal operation and multiple fault scenarios, such as inlet valve fluttering, outlet valve fluttering, check valve faults, and combined inlet and outlet valve issues. A range of features, including statistical and autoregressive moving average features were extracted from the acquired vibration signals to effectively differentiate among these conditions. Feature selection was executed using the J48 algorithm to identify the most pertinent indicators. During the classification phase, an exhaustive evaluation of individual classifiers, such as K-Nearest Neighbors, J48, support vector machine, multilayer perceptron (MLP), Naïve Bayes, logistic regression, random forest (RF), and logistic model tree, was conducted. The top-performing classifiers were subsequently selected for incorporation into ensemble voting systems. Within the ensemble voting framework, various configurations were explored, ranging from two to five classifiers, employing multiple voting strategies to optimize fault diagnosis performance. The findings of this study showcase that the combination of MLP and RF classifiers for statistical features produced the maximum classification accuracy of 98.67%.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
SAGE Publications , 2025.
National Category
Other Mechanical Engineering Computer and Information Sciences
Research subject
Operation and Maintenance Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-112049DOI: 10.1177/14759217251319743ISI: 001446261800001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105000489602OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-112049DiVA, id: diva2:1945236
Available from: 2025-03-18 Created: 2025-03-18 Last updated: 2025-10-21

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Venkatesh, Naveen

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Venkatesh, NaveenVaithiyanathan, Sugumaran
By organisation
Operation, Maintenance and Acoustics
In the same journal
Structural Health Monitoring
Other Mechanical EngineeringComputer and Information Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 46 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf