Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Household recycling and the influence of norms and convenience
Vattenfall, Sweden.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9270-8767
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2264-7043
2010 (English)In: Environmental Policy and Household Behaviour: Sustainability and Everyday Life / [ed] Patrik Söderholm, London: Earthscan / James & James, 2010, p. 193-209Chapter in book (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

As has been stressed throughout this book, environmental policy requires people’s active involvement, and many obligations are therefore expressed in household-related activities. The most commonly cited example of such an activity is the sorting of household waste. Recycling rates have increased consistently over time in most industrialized countries, and people are generally very willing to increase their recycling efforts even further. Even though it is often stressed that the sacrifices households make – not least in terms of time – may be substantial (e.g. Bruvoll et al, 2002), Skill and Wihlborg (Chapter 3 in this volume) note that household recycling may often be an excuse for household members not to undertake other pro-environmental activities. Moreover, recycling is typically a well-integrated activity in various ‘household projects’ (such as family meals), and it is often easy to perform recycling activities in daily life (e.g. if drop-off recycling stations are located close to large shopping centres). In this sense recycling takes a prominent role in the environmental consciousness of many households (see also Skill, 2008), and the separation of household waste appears to be a cost-effective way to take environmental responsibility. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
London: Earthscan / James & James, 2010. p. 193-209
Keywords [en]
Social sciences
National Category
Economics
Research subject
Economics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-20915DOI: 10.4324/9781315066004-11Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85144098663Local ID: 9327b3f0-af88-11df-a707-000ea68e967bOAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-20915DiVA, id: diva2:993959
Note

Godkänd; 2010; 20100824 (patrik_s);

ISBN for host publication: 978-1-84407-897-4, 978-1-31506-600-4

Available from: 2016-09-29 Created: 2016-09-29 Last updated: 2026-06-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Hage, OlleSöderholm, Patrik

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hage, OlleSöderholm, Patrik
By organisation
Social Sciences
Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 474 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf