Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Evaluating a Fischer-Tropsch fuel, eco-parst in a Valmet diesel engine
Luleå University of Technology.
2002 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Reports have stated that Fischer Tropsch (FT) fuels are high quality, low emission diesel fuel substitutes. The purpose of this study is to compare the emissions from a heavy-duty, Valmet, diesel engine running on a commercial available FT fuel, Eco-Par\sT, with the emissions obtained when the same engine is running on a low-sulfur diesel fuel with low aromatic content, Swedish environmental class 1 (EC-1) diesel fuel. The two fuels have been analyzed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and Raman Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The analyses showed that main constituents in the two fuels are alkanes with no substituents. No aromates or olefines could be detected. A small difference, later verified by gas chromatographic analyses, was noted; the Swedish EC-1 fuel consisted of a larger portion of straight chain, heavier hydrocarbons while the FT fuel consisted of more branched hydrocarbons. The overall impression of the emission analyses is that Eco- Par\sT gives lower emission than the EC-1 fuel during the modes employed in the ISO 8178 test. Emissions of acetaldehyde, benzaldehyde and acrolein were generally decreased 3-6 times when using FT fuel instead of EC-1 fuel while the emission of formaldehyde was unaffected. Fifteen volatile organic hydrocarbons were also included in the investigation - ethane, ethene, acetylene, propane, propene, propyne, propadiene, isobutene, isobutene, 1-butene, 1,3- butadiene, benzene, toluene, O-xylene and M-xylene. The emissions of the fifteen mentioned hydrocarbons were reduced between 20% - 93% when using Eco-Par\sT instead of EC-1. Measurements of the regulated emissions during an ISO 8178 test confirmed the obtained results; the emissions of total hydrocarbon (HC) decreased approx. 14% while the emissions of carbon monoxide, CO, and nitrogen oxides, NO\dx were almost unaffected. The test results in this investigation may indicate that diesel engines running on Eco-Par\sT can have a lower impact on environment and health than the, in Sweden, commonly used EC-1 fuel.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Warrendale, Pa.: Society of Automotive Engineers, Incorporated , 2002.
Series
S A E Technical Papers, ISSN 0148-7191 ; 2002-01-2726
National Category
Fluid Mechanics
Research subject
Engineering Acoustics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-24341Local ID: a90f19a0-0d0c-11dc-8745-000ea68e967bOAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-24341DiVA, id: diva2:997393
Note
Godkänd; 2002; 20070528 (andbra)Available from: 2016-09-29 Created: 2016-09-29 Last updated: 2025-10-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

http://www.sae.org/technical/papers/2002-01-2726

Authority records

Haupt, Dan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Haupt, Dan
By organisation
Luleå University of Technology
Fluid Mechanics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 60 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf